But most important, this interpretation agrees with Jesus reference to their rejecting Moses and the prophets regarding the divorce legislation in Luke 16. Jesus appears to take that freedom to divorce away and that is what sobered the disciples. On most understandings of the chronology of the life of Christ, this confrontation is thought to come after the Sermon, and likely after the confrontation over stewardship. The principle remains: God may challenge and require an individual to give something up for the sake of His kingdom that He still allows to someone else. The point would have been clear to such teachers, but they would likely have been scrambling for debaters points after being so thoroughly silenced by Jesus. https . Despite these fundamental, creation-rooted differences between the natures of men and women, God calls a husband and wife to come together as one, as one flesh. Certainly Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which seeks to protect the woman from the abuse of a hard-hearted husband, finds it proper for her to receive a certificate of divorce, and, just as certainly, that text does not require a woman to be divorced for the sin of adultery.351 As we noted earlier, there is no indication that uncleanness refers to any act of an immoral sort. Also, Herod had already taken notice of Jesus in regard to preaching like John (cf. It falls short, however, of noting the freedom of the woman to divorce and remarry. To legally nullify a contract, unless it is because of improper actions on the part of the partner, is dishonest (Matt. The negation is not emphatic. 337 Cf. He who is able to accept this, let him accept it, Though the reading may seem a bit stultified at some points, it seems no more so than a great many other places where the text is unquestionably preserved in full. Blue Letter Bible study tools make reading, searching and studying the Bible easy and rewarding. At no point is this more evident than in the eunuch saying, where the chauvinism of the disciples is quite pronounced. Sir 25:26. Remarriage of the innocent is a breach of the Seventh Commandment, which is interpreted by Derrett as forbidding the marriage of any unmarried people who will not or cannot marry. This view, called traditional by Heth and Wenham, is advocated by W. D. Davies and D. R. Catchpole.389 According to this view Jesus is agreeing with the disciples and issuing a call to celibacy. In other words, celibacy is elevated as a valid option for those who have not been given the gift of marriage (cf. GenesisExodusLeviticusNumbersDeuteronomyJoshuaJudgesRuth1 Samuel2 Samuel1 Kings2 Kings1 Chronicles2 ChroniclesEzraNehemiahEstherJobPsalmsProverbsEcclesiastesSong of SongsIsaiahJeremiahLamentationsEzekielDanielHoseaJoelAmosObadiahJonahMicahNahumHabakkukZephaniahHaggaiZechariahMalachiMatthewMarkLukeJohnActsRomans1 Corinthians2 CorinthiansGalatiansEphesiansPhilippiansColossians1 Thessalonians2 Thessalonians1 Timothy2 TimothyTitusPhilemonHebrewsJames1 Peter2 Peter1 John2 John3 JohnJudeRevelation, Select an Ending Point Hundredfold certainly is literally true in the spiritual sense. What Peter said was true, but it was not wisely spoken. The exclusively I do not doubt, but I deny the monogamy. Writing () Rev., bill. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. Jesus simply called this man to be His follower; but for this man it meant leaving behind the riches he had set his heart upon.
Matthew 19 Commentary - Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the v. If marriage is grounded in creation, in the way God has made us, then it cannot be reduced to a merely covenantal relationship that breaks down when the covenantal promises are broken. (Carson). ii. Jesus lays it down that there will be surprises in the final assessment it may be that those who were humble on earth will be great in heaven, and that those who were great in this world will be humbled in the world to come. (Barclay), ii. It states two conditions: divorce and marry. As well, sometimes riches are sought at the expense of seeking God. chap. He simply summarizes the major point of the teaching for emphasis. The apodosis cannot be alleged to obtain unless all the conditions that precede it obtain also. i. But who is guilty of the fornication in position number 3? Many modern teachers of the Bible find it easy here to interpret Jesus as implying that, since God has joined the partners, Jesus is saying that marriage was originally made a permanent institution. Honor God with your children. They had been concerned with when the man may walk away from his wife. Jesus points out that the design of marriage is not to see it end. They stop short of denying that it is possible for both parts to be modified, however. i. i. Our website uses cookies to store user preferences. What therefore God has joinedtogether, let no man separate.. Honor God With Your Marriage. * When Jesus finished these words: see note on Mt 7:28-29. Then little children were brought to Him: It is marvelous that in the midst of Jesus teaching on marriage, parents brought their children to be blessed. Matthews account has the Pharisees make Moses command divorce, whereas Mark has them note that Moses permitted divorce. i. Adam said this at the creation of Eve. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a Matthew is more specific and inclusive as a rule. & Other Early Christian Literature (University of Chicago Press, revised in 1961), p. 227, kai may have the connotation of purpose. They cite only Revelation 14:15 as an example of this use. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.". chap. He departed from Galilee and came to the region of Judea: The records of Matthew, Mark, and Luke focus on the Galilean ministry of Jesus, and only emphasize His presence in Jerusalem right before His crucifixion and resurrection. 24:1-4 to find the places where the inspiration breaks! Actually, the statements in Mark and Luke, when abstracted and considered out of their context, do seem to prohibit all divorce and remarriage, but, when seen in their contexts and in the context of Matthews exception clauses, they prohibit only divorces that are ill grounded, i.e., not grounded in porneia.367. So Israel did in their times of national revival. If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here: We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. When that complement became a covenanted couple, a union was formed, and the choice to do so involved an intention never to go back to their former singlenessit was an intention to permanency. 367 Wenham persists in pressing the syntax argument (cf. The principle stands: God will be a debtor to no man.
Matthew 19-20 - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints The state might well execute a murderer and cremate the body. 18 and 20; Deut. Next, notice that the statements themselves are ethically suspect Who would make such a statement as number 1? Even Shammai, who permitted a man to divorce his wife if she had committed an act tantamount to adultery, does not go on to call a divorce without such a ground the sin of adultery. 386 Heth and Wenham, Jesus and Divorce (in manuscript), p. 40. . You remember the old Romish legend, which contains a great truth. Matt 5:32), 3. And, being concerned with locations, he mentions the house. Mark simply did not want to get into a discussion of the discipline of others. The Old Testament Great multitudes followed Him, and He healed them there: Matthew points this out so his readers understand that the popularity and power of Jesus was not restricted to Galilee. But, I submit, it must be argued, and that is not really done. To be said in its favor is that the New Testament is expressly concerned with this matter in a number of locations.341 Moreover, to have placed Jesus in jeopardy with Herod would have significantly endangered His ministryexactly the goal of the Pharisees. It seems preferable to identify the statement with Jesus previous teaching. The Erasmian view is still possible, as they admit. 3. i. You can copy the order of your preferred Bible translations from the Bibles Tab to the Version Picker (this popup) or vice versa. This teaching of Jesus shows us that marriage, as a promise made to God, to our spouse and to the world, is a binding promise, and cannot be broken at our own discretion. It was as if Adam said, You are different than me; but you were made for me and from me. The point of the Malachi passage is that the abiding sin is the rejection of the valid partner. Thus it is improper to say that all divorces that end in remarriage are adulterous. Nonetheless, women divorcing men was rare in Israel, and for Jesus to have brought this point up in front of the Pharisees would only have put the subject off on a sidetrack. To the Judean territory by way of Peraea, i.e., along the eastern shore of Jordan. (Bruce) Mark 10:1 and Luke 9:51 indicate the same journey. It has a selfish, grasping lookAfter all, what have any of us to lose for Jesus compared with what we gain by him? (Spurgeon). Click to enable/disable _gat_* - Google Analytics Cookie. The focus of that was that men who treacherously divorce their wives in order to marry other woman or who are a party to breaking up someone elses marriage in order to claim the newly released woman are guilty of adultery in the eyes of His father. 408 From the Old Testament we may well be in doubt as to the propriety of the guilty wife remarrying. Jesus does not agree with the silly reflection of the disciples. Just because A and B are alike in the stated formal respect Y does not mean that they are alike in the material respect Z. God sometimes repays them in this life, as He restored Job after his trial to greater riches. (Luke 16:18), 2. Jesus refuses to hear the blemished testimony of men who have set the woman up for the charge of adultery. i. You remember the old Romish legend, which contains a great truth. There are many reasons people give today to justify divorce that do not fulfill the two Biblical allowances for divorce. All three gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) tell us this man was rich. As with all sins, it continues until repentance occurs. b. The answer is that both did, though not at the same time. Proverbs 26:5 tells us to answer a fool as his folly deserves, lest he be wise in his own eyes. This is, I think, exactly what Jesus does. I cannot agree to either point. a. 350 Lev. What, then, is the this way that has not been from the beginning? But in their cautious statement they speak better than they know! The accompanying pronoun, her, identifies his first wife as the recipient of that offensive action. Though this all sounds tempting, this views major drawback is that it commits a logical fallacy. Haste makes waste! Then He said that though they would be rewarded, it would be different than man usually expects; because we usually believe that the first will be first and the last will be last. Christ Leaves Galilee and Enters Judea. Well, it may be so, though it is more likely that both would share their Masters praise. Marriage is given, not that two people should do one thing together, but that they should do all things together. (Barclay) Be glued to her. (Trapp), iv. And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from Galilee --This marks a very solemn period in our Lord's public ministry. (Matthew 19:21-22) Jesus tests him by the aspects of the Mosaic Law which deal with mans relationship to God. By the nature of human beings as fallen, salvation is beyond them, unless God acts. The saying (thus far) is a conditional statement. The first, granted by all scholars, is that Mark is a fast paced Gospel, designed that way, in all likelihood, so that it may function as a sort of catechetical tool, perhaps a manual on evangelism.401 His Gospel being a sort of primer focusing upon gospel issues, Mark considered the larger body of materials that were available to him and the other Gospel writers and edited out whatever material he thought superfluous to his task.402 It is my belief that Mark eliminated the exception clause for the sake of logical economy.403. Error: Passwords should have at least 6 characters, Error: Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores. It was a Jewish custom to bring a child to the elders on the evening of the Day of Atonement to bless him and pray for him (Mishnah Sopherim 18:5). (France), ii. Jesus passes over this Old Testament instruction (Exod. i. Jesus seems to lump them all together into a unit of misinformed moralists: Pharisees. c. But many who are first will be last, and the last first: In the previous words, Jesus promised that those who sacrificed for His sake and the sake of His kingdom would be rewarded. Whether she divorced him or was he was forced to end the legalities (as in Exodus) in such instances, the covenant was ended in the eyes of God when he abused her. Sinning again against a covenant is not a proper way to be righteous. This is not as bad as speaking of elevating celibacy, but I still feel uncomfortable with it. For another, she may have remarried herself. The one is to believe this applies to everyone, when Jesus never made this a general command to all who would follow Him, but especially to this one rich man whose riches were clearly an obstacle to his discipleship. Sell all you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me: The call to forsake everything and follow Jesus is a call to put God first in all things. It is not the mere number of words that is at issue. In effect, its proponents are saying: In A there is a formal pattern Y with content Z. 7. Though polygamy was allowed under the Old Testament, it was never Gods best and men should have known so from looking at Genesis 2:24. d. What God has joined together: Jesus also reminded the Pharisees that marriage is spiritually binding before God. Even the guilty party who repents but is not forgiven is not to be identified with the divorce/remarriage prohibited by Christ. Thank you for registering. 1 Now it came to pass, when Jesus had finished these sayings, that He departed from Galilee and came to the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. Poetical Books It seemed that Jesus had opened the door for them. This means that the man will pay a reasonable amount of alimony and child support. To unilaterally, legally nullify a contract and make another is dishonest. Thus, Jesus is promoting celibacy for the sake of the kingdom. Whoever divorces his wife, and marries another woman commits adultery against her, and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery., The disciples said to him, If the relationship of the man with his wife is like this, it is better not to marry., But he said to them, Not all men can accept this statement, but only those to whom it has been given. Among the Jews of that day, marriage was a sacred duty. Alas for their argument. Johannine Writings If there is not such sundering prior to it, then the legal divorce is itself the sunderingis a treachery, is adultery. 2. The number 3 location is even more confusing grammatically and conceptually. Josephus saith, The law runs thus: 'He that would be disjoined from his wife, for any cause whatsoever, let him give her a bill of divorce.' And he confesseth, that he himself put away his wife, after she had borne him three children, 'because he was not pleased with her behaviour.' The actions are not certain to occur, but if they do they will be definite actions done by the male agent: he puts away [his first wife] and he marries [another woman]. 2. Thus, no legitimate marriage may be morally broken by divorce. The woman who intentionally has sex with another man sunders her marriage. Then little children were brought to Him that He might put His hands on them and pray, but the disciples rebuked them. Divorce is said to be absolutely prohibited (p. 198). (Matthew 19:10-12) The disciples ask about marriage and celibacy. 379 They do believe that there is a proper ground for divorce. Commentary on Matthew 19:16-22. 2. The exemplary life plus the dissatisfaction meant muchI am on the right road, according to your teaching; why then do I not attain the rest of the true, godly life? (Bruce). You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. Historical Books Additionally note that in a sense the referent is the concessionnot as Moses meant it, but as the Pharisees had interpreted it! Pentateuch GenesisExodusLeviticusNumbersDeuteronomyJoshuaJudgesRuth1 Samuel2 Samuel1 Kings2 Kings1 Chronicles2 ChroniclesEzraNehemiahEstherJobPsalmsProverbsEcclesiastesSong of SongsIsaiahJeremiahLamentationsEzekielDanielHoseaJoelAmosObadiahJonahMicahNahumHabakkukZephaniahHaggaiZechariahMalachiMatthewMarkLukeJohnActsRomans1 Corinthians2 CorinthiansGalatiansEphesiansPhilippiansColossians1 Thessalonians2 Thessalonians1 Timothy2 TimothyTitusPhilemonHebrewsJames1 Peter2 Peter1 John2 John3 JohnJudeRevelation, Select a Beginning Point Christ's promises make his precepts easy, and his yoke pleasant and very . This option is certainly grammatically harsh. They thus sought to drive a wedge between Jesus and the Law, thus discrediting Him with the people by showing His earlier words did abrogate the Law. It is my thought that the Greek conjunction here reflects a similar use of the Hebrew vav (and) See TWOT, Vol.
Questions About Divorce (Matthew 19:1-12; Mark 10:1-12) All these need not worry about marriage rules. They are trying to test Jesus and find grounds for accusing Him. Now Jesus, in Judea is questioned by them and their questions were not honest. It picks what it wishes to support and then creates a scenario that it then offers as evidence. The guilty becomes the innocent, and the innocent becomes the guilty. He departed from Galilee and came to the region of Judea, Great multitudes followed Him, and He healed them there, The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife, He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, Be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh, Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away, If such is the case it is better not to marry, All cannot accept this saying, but only those to whom it has been given, What good thing shall I do to inherit eternal life, If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments, All these things I have kept from my youth, Sell all you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me, He went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions, It is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel, Everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters, But many who are first will be last, and the last first, David Guzik :: Hechos 10 Cornelio, Pedro, y la Conversin de los Gentiles, David Guzik :: 2 Timoteo 3 Los Tiempos Peligrosos y la Preciosa Verdad, David Guzik :: 1 Samuel 22 David en la Cueva de Adulam, Sal Asesina a los Sacerdotes, H5377 - n' - Strong's Hebrew Lexicon (kjv), David Guzik :: Gnesis 3 La tentacin y cada del hombre, David Guzik :: 1 Juan 2 Impedimentos para una comunin con Dios, David Guzik :: 1 Samuel 16 Dios Elige a David, Jonathan Edwards :: Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, David Guzik :: Apocalipsis 12 La Mujer, el Nio, y el Dragn, Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesus and the Holy Trinity (Walter Martin), Genesis 27-28 (1979-82 Audio) (Chuck Smith), Isaiah 6-10 (1979-82 Audio) (Chuck Smith), Genesis 24-26 (1979-82 Audio) (Chuck Smith). It is to be remembered that though Jesus does not discuss it, Exodus 21 teaches that there are valid reasons for a wife becoming free from her husband. Was God unconcerned for the well-being of wives from the beginning? And some Pharisees came up to him, testing him, and began to question him whether it was lawful for a man to divorce a wife, saying, Is it awful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause at all?, And he answered and said to them, What did Moses command you?, And they said. Against this one might argue that the presence of the exception clause between the conditions spreads the two apart. a. iv. Normal font is common material. 351 It is sad to note that Heth/Wenham, in their work on the divorce teaching of Jesus, take such a cavalier attitude toward the God/divorce/Israel language of the Old Testament They say that one should not take such language seriously, because if one does, one will also have to take the God/polygyny language seriously. Therefore, number 3 is also not a true statement. At the end of the protasis (i.e., after marries another) and before the apodosis (i.e., the result, commits adultery). Generally one of three alternatives is discussed: The Pharisees were trying to get Jesus to take sides with one or the other of the two Pharasaic schools: Hillel or Shammai, According to this idea, the dominant Hillel group was trying to get Jesus to side with the more conservative Shammai group, thus discrediting Him with the majority of the people, who were presumably favoring the more lenient position.337. But Heth/Wenham object that such an interpretation is wrong for just that reason, as noted earlier: in the Gospels, Jesus seldom agrees with the disciples.
Downingtown East High School Graduation 2023,
Sedation Grooming For Dogs,
How Much Did Monopoly Cost In 1945,
Hynes Convention Center Boston,
Articles M